(18.97.14.83)
[ij] [ij] [ij] 
Email id
 

Year : 2022, Volume : 10, Issue : 15
First page : ( 183) Last page : ( 187)
Print ISSN : 2349-9885. Online ISSN : 2582-5089. Published online : 2022  16.
Article DOI : 10.5958/2582-5089.2022.00022.6

Population dynamics of mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt) in relation to biotic factors

Ram Nema1,*, Pawariya Vikash2, Mundiyara Rajdeep3, Bajiya Rohitash4

1Assistant Professor (Entomology), College of Agriculture, Sumerpur, Rajasthan, India

2Assistant Professor (Agricultural Economics), College of Agriculture, Nagaur, Rajasthan, India

3Assistant Professor (Genetics and Plant Breeding), Agricultural Research Sub Station, Nagaur, Rajasthan, India

4Assistant Professor (Agronomy), Agricultural Research Sub Station, Nagaur, (Agriculture University, Jodhpur), Rajasthan, India

*Email: nr_ranwa@rediffmail.com

Online Published on 16 September, 2023.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Rabi 2019-2020 at Research Farm of Agricultural Research Sub Station Nagaur (Agriculture University, Jodhpur) to know the pest incidence in mustard variety ’BIO 902’. The incidence of aphid 3.65 aphids per plant started in the first week of January (1st SMW) continued thereafter for a long period and reached to maximum 128.80 aphids per plant in the third week of February (7th SMW). The incidence of ladybird beetles appeared in the second week of January and reached its peak 9.95 coccinellids/plant in the third week of February (7th SMW). The correlation coefficient of L. erysimi with ladybird beetle population had a positive significant correlation (r= 0.979).

Top

Keywords

Mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi, Population dynamics, Biotic factors, Ladybird beetles, Coccinellids.

Top

Introduction

Mustard, Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss is an important Crucifer oilseed crops grown in rabi season as oilseed, condiment and medicinal crops all over the globe. From the nutritional point of view, mustard contains edible oil (38 to 46%), erucic acid (38 to 57%), linolenic acid (4.7 to 13%) and oleic acid (27%) which are of high nutritive value required for the human body (Downey, 1983). The seeds and oil of mustard have a peculiar pungency, thus suitable for making condiments and for the preparation of pickles, curries and vegetables. It is widely used for making soap, varnishes, paints, hair oils, medicines, softening of leather and lubricants etc. (Patel, 2005). Apart from this the tender green leaves and stems are also used for making vegetables.

This crop accounts for nearly one-third of the oil produced in India, making it the country’s key edible oilseed crop, mainly grown in the states of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Gujarat, Jharkhand and Assam as a cold weather crop. The total area under the crop in India is about 6.86 million hectares with a production of 9.12 million tonnes. In Rajasthan, it occupies an area of 3.08 million hectares with an annual production of 4.20 million tonnes (Anonymous, 2021). Since it is cultivated mainly in the rain-fed and resource-scarce regions of the country, their contribution to the livelihood security of the small and marginal farmers in these regions is also very important.

There are so many biotic and abiotic factors which are responsible for the low production of mustard in this region. Out of these, Insect-pests are one of the major limiting factors for higher production of mustard. Bakhetia & Sekhon (1989) listed 38 species of insect pests on rapeseed and mustard crops in India. Among these, the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.); mustard sawfly, Athalia lugens proxima (Klug.); painted bug, Bagrada hilaris (Burm.) and the leaf miner, Phytomyza horticola (Goureau) are the major ones. Mustard aphid, L. erysimi was reported to be a regular and major insect pest in Rajasthan and other parts of the country, causing 35.4 to 73.3 per cent yield loss, 30.09 per cent seed weight loss and 2.75 per cent oil loss (Bakhetia & Sekhon, 1989; Singh & Premchand, 1995; Sharma & Kashyap, 1998). L. erysimi belongs to the family Aphididae of the order Hemiptera and suborder Homoptera. Both the nymph and adult stages of this pest cause quantitative and qualitative losses in the mustard crop by sucking the cell sap from leaves, petioles, tender stems, inflorescence and pods. Due to its fast multiplication within a few days, aphid covers the entire crop, particularly in cloudy weather. As a result of continuous sucking by large aphid numbers cause yellowing, curling and subsequent drying of leaves, which ultimately leads to the formation of weak siliqua (pod) and undersized seeds. The pest also secretes the honeydew, which provides a suitable medium for the development of sooty mould, which ultimately hampers the process of photosynthesis (Atwal & Dhaliwal, 2015).

It is well known that population dynamics of insect pests depend upon climatic conditions, crop growth stage and incidence of its natural enemies at a particular time. The interaction between pest activity and biotic factors helps in deriving predicative models that in turn forecast the pest incidence. Coccinellid predators, Coccinella septempunctata L. and Menochilus sexmaculatus Fab. play a significant role in the reduction of the aphid population. Therefore, present studies were undertaken to know the population dynamics of mustard aphid in relation to its biotic factors.

Top

Materials and Methods

A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2019-2020 at Research Farm of Agricultural Research Sub Station Nagaur (Agriculture University, Jodhpur) to know the pest incidence in mustard variety ‘BIO 902’. The experiment was laid out in four plots, having sizes 3.0 x 3.0 metres with row-to-row and plant-to-plant distances were 30 and 10 cm, respectively. The crop was sown on October 23, 2019. Half of the recommended dose of nitrogenous fertilizer and a full dose of phosphatic and potassic fertilizer was applied at the time of the last ploughing and the rest of the nitrogenous fertilizer was applied through top dressing at the time of flowering. The experimental plots were kept free from weeds by manual weeding and hoeing. All the agronomic management practices were followed from time to time as per the package and practices booklet of the region. Observations on the aphid population were recorded soon after the appearance of the aphids. The population of aphids was recorded on five randomly selected and tagged plants per plot. Initially, the population of aphids was recorded on the whole plant as a single unit but later on, the aphids were counted per 10 cm long top portion of central twig per plant causing the least possible disturbances as per technique described by Mathur & Singh (1986) & Pradhan et al. (1960). The population of different natural enemies were recorded on the whole plant simultaneously with the population of aphids at weekly intervals. A simple correlation was worked out between the mean population of aphids and their natural enemies.

Top

Results and Discussion

During the present research, aphid was recorded as a major pest infesting mustard crop at different stages of plant growth (Plate 1). The data presented in Table 1 and Figure 1 showed that infestation of L. erysimi during rabi, 2019-20 commenced in the first week of January (1st SMW) continued thereafter for a long period and disappeared in the second week of March (10th SMW) before the crop matured. Initially, the population was recorded to be 3.65 aphids per plant (1st SMW) which increased gradually and reached to maximum 128.80 aphids per plant in the third week of February (7th SMW). A gradual decline in the population of aphids was recorded thereafter. The present investigation gets support from the findings of Pradhan et al. (2020) who observed that L. erysimi remain active from the last week of December to 9th SMW. The results of Dotasara et al. (2022) also confirm the present findings who reported that aphid L. erysimi incidence began in the 1st standard meteorological week of January during 2017 and 2018, reaching a peak in the 5th SMW in 2017 and in the 4th SMW in 2018. These results were also at par with the results of Singh & Lal (2012) who reported that the appearance of the mustard aphid population started in the 2nd week of January and reached its peak in the 8th standard week.

The predatory species of ladybird beetles, viz., Coccinella septem punctata Linn. and Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabr.) have been found preying aphid, L. erysimi on the mustard crop. Out of these, C. septempunctata was reported to be the dominant one (Plate 2). The incidence of ladybird beetles (both beetles and grubs) appeared in the second week of January (0.40 coccinellids/plants) i.e. 2nd SMW and reached its peak 9.95 coccinellids/plant in the third week of February (7th SMW). Thereafter, the population started declining and disappeared in third week of March. The correlation coefficient of L. erysimi with ladybird beetle population had a positive significant correlation (r= 0.979). The results showed that ladybird beetle population had significantly controlled the population of aphids in natural conditions in crop ecosystems. The present findings corroborate with the earlier findings of Dotasara et al. (2022); Lal et al. (2018); Singh et al. (2017); Varshney et al. (2017) and Singh & Lokeshwari (2010) who reported that coccinellid predator revealed a significant positive correlation with aphid.

Top

Figures

Plate 1:

Damage of L. erysimi on pod and inflorescence of mustard




TopBack

Figure 1:

Populations of L. erysimi and lady bird beetles




TopBack

Plate 2:

Lady bird beetle (Grub, pupa and adult)



TopBack

Table

Table 1:

Populations of mustard aphid, L. erysimi and ladybird beetle



Meteorological WeekAphid population per plant*Ladybird population per plant*
13.650.00
217.450.40
333.801.20
455.552.75
580.054.40
6116.307.75
7128.809.95
874.855.30
927.151.75
104.300.65
The correlation coefficient of L. erysimi with Ladybird population0.979**

* Mean of five plants/plot; ** Significant at 1% level

TopBack

Acknowledgement

The authors are highly thankful to the Dean, College of Agriculture, Nagaur and the Officer Incharge, Agricultural Research Sub Station Nagaur (Agriculture University, Jodhpur) for providing the facilities during the research.

Top

References

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

TopBack

 
║ Site map ║ Privacy Policy ║ Copyright ║ Terms & Conditions ║ Page Rank Tool
905,350,707 visitor(s) since 30th May, 2005.
All rights reserved. Site designed and maintained by DIVA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD..
Note: Please use Internet Explorer (6.0 or above). Some functionalities may not work in other browsers.