Some issues of correlation between international standards of justice and criminal procedure legislation of the republic of Uzbekistan

The article examines a number of issues that arise when analyzing the relationship between international standards of justice and criminal procedure legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The possibility of strengthening judicial control over the investigation is being clarified, and a number of proposals are being made to amend the current criminal procedure legislation. It should be especially noted that such a judge does not participate either in the preliminary investigation or in the examination of the criminal case on the merits, i.e. making a decision on the guilt or innocence of the defendant. Unless otherwise established by treaties and agreements concluded by the Republic of Uzbekistan with other states. Note, however, that the said Resolution calls on states to join and ratify treaties in this direction and take into account the already existing international legal practice [3]. Accordingly, the recommendatory, nonmandatory nature of the standards is emphasized. It seems that these statements, in addition to the assumption of a direct infringement of state sovereignty, allow us to assume an automatic, thoughtless transfer to the law enforcement practice of state bodies, any provisions of international acts, even if they are arbitrarily referred to as regulating human rights.