1Departmetnt of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad Univresity, Khorramabad, Iran
2DOS in Physical Education and Sports Sciences Sports Pavilion, University of Mysore, 570 005, India
3DOS In Biochemistry, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, 570 006, India
Online published on 15 February, 2013.
The aim of this study was the effects of static and dynamic stretching on delayed soreness and increased creatine kinase have been compared with each other.
Two groups of 20 male students were selected randomly from the static and dynamic stretching.Students in all three periods did 30 stretching exercises for 80 minutes. The difference between groups was only that for 40 seconds in state they performed. In But the dynamic of these movements were performed in the state statistical methods used in this study are descriptive and inferential statistics. In order to obtain the required information, the measurement of plasma creatine kinase enzyme activity in laboratory subjects, Standard Likert pain test is used to measure pain. Isometric digital dynamometer is used to measure lower body, for measurement of hip range of motion (hip flexion),the monometer is used. To analyze the average measurement of delayed muscle soreness and creatine kinase enzyme (CK), down isometric trunk and hip motion analysis of variance tests were used.
In summary it can be concluded. that the implementation, training, extreme stretching, either static or dynamic, cause delayed soreness, along with increasing concentrations of creatine kinase(CK), and loss of isometric strength in lower body. While, in the dynamic group, the amount of delay in fatigue, and loss of isometric strength in lower body is significantly more if the group is static.
Delayed muscle soreness, Static stretching, Dynamic stretching, Creatine kinase
