Criminal procedural terms in the republic of Uzbekistan

The article discusses the history of development, the concept, the essence of criminal procedural terms and the problems of compliance with procedural terms. Suggestions have been developed to improve the norms of the current criminal procedure legislation by introducing the principle of “Reasonable terms in criminal proceedings”. As each stage of the criminal process progresses sequentially and consistently, the adherence to the principle of legality at all stages of the process [22], and the timely enforcement of certain rights and obligations of the parties to the proceedings are related to the procedural deadlines. Most modern legal scholars have argued that procedural time is a period of time during which procedural actions are required or abstained, and they are compelling because they are defined in the CPC [4]. The definition in this context more fully explains the term and the imperative nature of the regulation of both the motion and the inertia of the term (compulsory enforcement and existence of legal consequences). In this respect, they are not considered criminal procedural deadlines. Failure to comply with the timeframes established by the criminal procedure law or those charged with criminal proceedings, in contrast, can have serious legal consequences, such as failure to recognize the consequences of procedural actions or invalidation of decisions made; compulsory delivery; causing the suspect or accused to be released from prison. “The criminal case must be conducted within a reasonable time. All participants in the criminal procedure must comply with the criminal procedural deadlines. Failure to adhere to them will result in the failure to recognize the consequences of procedural actions or invalidate the decisions taken ”