1Faculty of Science, Chemistry Department, Badji Mokhtar University Annaba, Annaba, Algeria
2Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Sétif 1 - Ferhat Abbas, El Bez, Setif, 19000
3Department of Process Engineering and Petrochemistry, Faculty of Technology, University of El Oued, 39000, El-Oued, Algeria
4Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Material Sciences, Amine Elokkal El hadjMoussa Eg Akhamouk University - Tamanrasset, Algeria
5Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of material sciences, Amine Elokkal Elhadj Moussa Eg Akhamouk University - Tamanrasset, Algeria
*Corresponding Author E-mail: abdelrahmanebouafia@gmail.com
Online Published on 12 October, 2023.
EU Directive for the Protection of Laboratory Animals mandates and encourages the use of alternative methods that could substitute, cut down on, and generally improve animal testing. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models (QSAR) as well as in vitro toxicity testing are among the most notable of such. QSARs are defined as computerized mathematical models that can utilize a compound’s (aromatic amine) biological activity—aquatic toxicity—to calculate or provide the experimental descriptors of the chemical structure of this compound. Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are the approaches we use for the aim of predicting aquatic toxicity. The best models for two descriptors are the electrotopological descriptors derived from E-calc, and the partition coefficient derived by the Hyperchem software, applying a genetic algorithm—variable subset selection procedure. The important values of the statistical parameters obtained by the two approaches were as follows: By MLR: R2= 92.18, Q2 = 90.51, Q2ext= 95.26, F=188.5466, S = 0.1995. By ANN were: Q2 = 94.79, RMSE= 0.16, Q2ext= 91.71, RMSEext=0.18.
Aquatic toxicity, Aromatic amines, Quantitative structure-activity relationship, Multiple linear regression, Artificial neural networks