1Senior Resident, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Senior lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, I.T.S Centre for Dental Studies and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
*Corresponding Author Dr. Priti Shukla, Senior Resident, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Email: drpritipankaj@gmail.com
Online published on 17 February, 2020.
Patients would like to undergo a painless procedure and minimal time taken for his treatment.
To compare the transverse and antero-posterior changes in both maxillary and dental arches using self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets.
Two groups of 10 patients each were: GROUP A: conventionally ligated pre-adjusted edgewise appliance and GROUP B: self-ligating appliance. Dental casts of both the groups A and B were routinely made at T0, T1, T3, T6. Measurements were done in transverse plane from: inter canine, inter premolar, inter molar and in Antero-posterior plane from distal aspect of first permanent molar to the anterior limit of the arch.
The mean difference in premolar width, inter molar width and anteroposterior width in upper and lower arch from pre-t/t (t0) to (t1), pre-t/t (t0) to (t3) and pre-t/t (t0) to (t6) was significantly more among self-ligating group in comparison to conventional group.
Dental arches, self-ligating bracket system, conventional bracket system
