Agricultural Development and Rural Transformation Centre [ADRTC], Institute for Social and Economic Change [ISEC], Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
This article is an output of the late led investigation entitled ‘Impact of Neem Covered Urea on Production, Productivity, and Soil Health in India’ across six major agricultural states of India. A sample of 2200 farmers growing major crops using Neem Coated Urea (NCU) and Normal Urea (NU) under irrigated and un-irrigated conditions was selected randomly. Data was elicited for the agriculture year 2016–17 through a survey method. The per acre paid-out costs incurred by both NCU and NU users with respect to ploughing and sowing, seed/purchase of seedlings, organic/FYM, normal urea/neem coated urea, chemical fertilizers, plant protection chemicals, irrigation charges, harvesting & threshing charges, hired labour charges (including ploughing charges till planting, cost or sowing/transplanting), imputed value of family labour, hired labour (amount paid) and maintenance costs on assets were worked out by way of comparing the economics of NCU and NU usage. The results reveal that the total paid-out costs of paddy have slightly increased in respect of NCU, as compared to NU. However, the net returns received amount to ` 23,616/-per acre and ` 19,517/-per acre, respectively. As regards
Mandatory production and distribution of NCU started from May 2015 by the GoI.
NCU found to be cost-effective as compared to Normal Urea.
NCU benefits are much higher than Normal Urea.
Neem coated urea, Normal urea, Cost of Inputs, Input use, Market Price, Gross Returns