1
2
3
4
5
*Corresponding author: caerahaman62@gmail.com (ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9047-942X)
Traditional harvesting is a labor-intensive and expensive procedure; farmers often spend 25 to 30 percent of crop production costs on harvesting. Harvesting at right time is most important factor, as delay of harvesting operation results in significant grain loss due to shattering their by reducing yield of a crop. The feasibility and adoptability of developed pulse crop harvester was evaluated by following constrains such as benefit cost ratio, breakeven point, cost of operation, net present value payback period and revenue cost ratio by using standard test procedures. The cost of operation is 1757.40
⓿ Total cost spent in development of pulse crop harvester was
⓿ Benefit cost ratio of pulse crop harvester was 2.4:1.
⓿ Payback period of pulse crop harvester was 1.37 year.
Payback period, Breakeven point, Net present value, Benefit cost ratio, Cost of operation, Revenue cost ratio