Indian Journal of Agronomy
  • Year: 2015
  • Volume: 60
  • Issue: 4

Integrating herbicidal and conventional approach for profitable weed management in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)

  • Author:
  • Parvender Sheoran1,, Virender Sardana2, Ashwani Kumar3, Anita Mann1, Sukhvinder Singh4
  • Total Page Count: 4
  • Page Number: 581 to 584

1Senior Scientist, ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132 001

2Senior Agronomist, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141 004

3Scientist, ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, 132 001

4Breeder, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141 004

Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141 004

*Corresponding author Email: sheoran76@rediffmail.com

Online published on 15 February, 2016.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2009 and 2010 at Ludhiana, Punjab in the Indo-Gangetic alluvial plains, to work out an effective weed-management strategy in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Almost two-thirds of the weed infestation was dominated by sedges, followed by broad-leaf (26.3%) and grassy (9.3%) weeds. Season long weed competition reduced the mean seed yield of groundnut by 60.9%. Alone application of herbicides either through pendimethalin or imazethapyr provided effective weed control (43.5–53.3% weed-control efficiency) but the late flushes and escaped/regenerated weeds at later stages hampered the crop yield significantly. Integrated approach involving sequential application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha pre-emergence (PE) and imazethapyr 0.05 kg/ha post-emergence (PoE) supplemented with 1 hand-weeding 45 days after sowing (DAS) provided 83.7% weed-control efficiency, 2.11 t/ha pod yield, 4.3 × 103/ha net returns with benefit: cost ratio of 2.99 which was as good as implying 2 hand-weedings 3 and 6 weeks after sowing.

Keywords

Economics, Groundnut, Pod yield, Weed-management