1Assistant Agronomist, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141 004
2Senior Extension Specialist, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141 004
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141 004
*Corresponding author Email: simer@pau.edu
Online published on 8 September, 2016.
A field experiment was conducted at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab) during the rainy (kharif) season of 2009 and 2010, to study the effect of various establishment methods and weed-control treatments on weeds, crop growth, yield attributes and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.). The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with 5 establishment methods, i.e. dry-seeding with 3 different drills-zero till drill, modified furrow drill, conventional seed-cum-fertilizer drill in unpuddled soil, wet-seeding or manual broadcast in puddled soil and manual transplanting in puddled soil, and 4 weed-control treatments, viz. pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha, sequential application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha and bispyribac 0.025 kg/ha or azimsulfuron 0.02 kg/ha and weed-free in 4 replications. Weed biomass at harvesting, effective tillers and grain yield did not vary significantly among different establishment methods. At 60 days after sowing, 27% more plant height, 5.6% more number of tillers and 49% more crop biomass were recorded under direct seeding methods than transplanting method. More net returns (36, 660/ha) and energy output: input ratio (5.04) were recorded under dry seeding methods than wet seeding (28, 792/ha and 4.24) and puddled transplanted method (27, 305/ha and 4.47). The maximum grain yield (6.7 t/ha) was recorded under weed-free treatment which was statistically at par with sequential use of pendimethalin 0.75 kg/ha with bispyribac 0.025 kg (6.6 t/ha) or azimsulfuron 0.02 kg/ha (6.5 t/ha). Sequential application of pre-and post-emergence herbicides resulted in more benefit: cost ratio (1.66) and energy output: input ratio (5.32).
Direct-seeded rice, Energetics, Economics, Transplanted rice, Weed control