1Senior Scientist, Choudhary Sarvan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062
2Principal Scientist, Choudhary Sarvan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062
3Ph. D. Student, Choudhary Sarvan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062
4Principal Scientist, Choudhary Sarvan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062
Choudhary Sarvan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062
*Corresponding author's Email: ranass_dee@yahoo.com
Online published on 9 October, 2017.
A field experiment was conducted in a permanent layout for 7 consecutive years (rainy season 2007 to winter season (2010) at Palampur for yield maximization of rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system through site-specific nutrient management. Twelve combinations of primary, secondary and micronutrients [T1, N100P25K120S40B5Zn20, (figure as subscript indicate dose in kg/ha of N, P2O5, K2O, S, Borax and ZnSO4, respectively) T2, N100P50K120S40B5Zn20; T3, N100P0K120S40B5Zn20; T4, N100P25K80S40B5Zn20; T5, N100 P25K40S40B5Zn20; T6, N100P25 K0S40B5Zn20; T7, N100P25K120S40B5Zn0; T8, N100P25K120S40B0Zn20; T9, N100P25K120S0B5 Zn20; T10, N100P25K120S0B0Zn0; T11, RDF, (recommended dose of fertilizers, N90P40K40 for rice and N120P60K30 for wheat) and T12, INM (integrated nutrient management, N36P16K16 + 5 t FYM/ha for rice and N48P24K12 + 5 t FYM/ha for wheat]-based upon the available nutrient status of the site were evaluated. N, P and K were applied to both the crops. S, B and Zn were applied to rice only. State recommended application of nutrients (T11) maintained its superiority for rice grain yield initially, however, N100P25K120S0B0Zn0 (T10) excelled over it at last. INM practice (T12) was lowest yielder in the early years but at last next only after N100P25K120S0B0Zn0 and RDF. The complete deletion of K application from N100P25K120S40 B5Zn20 under T6, resulted in significantly the lowest rice yield. In increasing wheat yield, N100P50K120 S40B5Zn20 maintained its superiority throughout and therefore, had the highest sustainable yield index. This was followed by N100P25K120S0B0Zn0, RDF and N100P25K120S40 B5Zn0 both in terms of yield and sustainability. The system productivity (rice + wheat grain) ranged between 5.0 (N100P25K120S0B0Zn0) to 12.7 t/ha (N100P50K120S40B5 Zn20) under different treatments. The system productivity and sustainability index was higher under N100P50K120S40 B5Zn20, RDF and N100P25K120S0B0Zn0 over other treatments. Among the soil properties, pH decreased significantly over the initial test value of 5.3 in all the treatments except INM (T12). A definite build up of organic carbon over its initial value of 0.7% was observed in N100P25K80S40B5Zn20, N100P25K40S40B5Zn20, N100P25K120 S0B0Zn0, RDF and INM treatment. There was depletion of available P in all the treatments over its initial test value of 50 kg/ha. There was significant build up of available K in N100P25K120S40B5Zn20, N100P0K120S40B5Zn20, N100P25K120 S40B5Zn0, N100P25K120S40 B0Zn20 and INM treatment over the initial status of 86 kg/ha. Available K was significantly low where no K or low K was applied. N100P25K120S0B0Zn0 gave the highest benefit: cost ratio of 3.07 and was comparable to RDF in influencing total net returns. N100P50K120S40B5Zn20 resulted in the highest total apparent nutrient recovery, apparent N recovery and N physiological productivity. P physiological productivity was the highest under RDF and K physiological productivity was the highest under N100P25K0S40B5Zn20.
Economics, Nutrient uptake, Rice-wheat cropping system, SSNM, Sustainability, Yield