1Research Scholar (Agronomy), Research Centre for Conservation and Utilization of Blue Green Algae
2Principal Scientist (Agronomy), Research Centre for Conservation and Utilization of Blue Green Algae
3Senior Scientist, Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012
4Principal Scientist (Agronomy)
ICAR Research Complex for North-Eastern Hills Region, Umiam, Barapani, Meghalaya, 793 103
*Corresponding author's Email: parkashverma677@gmail.com
Online published on 22 February, 2019.
A field study was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 2016 at Umiam, Barapani, Meghalaya, to find out the effect of different nutrient-management practices and microbial inoculants on yield-attributing characters, yield and profitability of lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Eastern Himalayas. The experiment consisted of 12 treat-ment combinations including 3 nutrient-management practices, viz. 100% organic, 100% inorganic [recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF)] and integrated nutrient management (INM; 75% RDF + 25% FYM), in main plot and 4 microbial inoculation treatments, viz. control, Azospirillum, Azospirillum + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB), Azospirillum + PSB + zinc-solubilizing bacteria (ZnSB) in subplots. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with 3 replications. The yield-attributing characters, viz. tillers/m2, panicle length and filled grains/panicle were the highest with INM treatment, followed by inorganic and organic nutrient-management practices. Similar trend was observed in case of 1, 000-seed weight, but it was at par with the other nutrient-management practices. The highest grain yield (4.27 t/ha) was recorded in INM, followed by inorganic (4.08 t/ha) and organic (3.65 t/ha) nutrient-management practice. Among the microbial inoculants, the highest yield was recorded in Azospirillum+ PSB + ZnSB treatment, followed by Azospirillum + PSB and Azospirillum treatment. The highest cost of cultivation ( 28, 829/ha) was recorded under organic nutrient management, while net returns ( 48, 615/ha) were maximum in INM practice with combined application of Azospirillum+ PSB + ZnSB. Thus, INM (75% RDF and 25% organic inputs, i.e. FYM) and microbial inoculants could be used for higher productivity and profitability of lowland rice in Eastern Himalayas.
Economics, Lowland rice, Microbial inoculants, Nutrient management, Yield