Indian Journal of Agronomy
  • Year: 2019
  • Volume: 64
  • Issue: 3

Influence of phosphorus fertilization on productivity and biological sustainability of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) + coriander (Coriandrum sativum) intercropping system

  • Author:
  • D.K. Shukla1,, V.K. Singh1, Chandra Bhushan1, Ajay Kumar1
  • Total Page Count: 5
  • Page Number: 315 to 319

1Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263 145

Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263 145

*Corresponding author's Email: shukladk1974@rediffmail.com

Online published on 20 July, 2020.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 2012–13 and 2013–14 at Norman E. Borlaug Crop Research Centre, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, to assess the productivity and competing ability of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) under different row ratios of intercropping and phosphorus management. Both the component crops, gave significantly higher seed yield in sole cropping compared to intercropping systems. Chickpea + coriander (4: 2) (3.71 t/ha), being at par with chickpea + coriander (3: 1) (3.40 t/ha), recorded significantly higher chickpea-equivalent yield than that of sole cropping. Land-equivalent ratio (1.32) and production efficiency (27.49 kg/ha/day) were significantly higher in chickpea + coriander (4: 2) than rest of the systems. Relative crowding coefficient (RCC) and agressivity (A) did not show influence of intercropping systems. Competition ratio (CR) of chickpea reduced significantly in chickpea + coriander (4: 2) than chickpea + coriander (3: 1). Sole chickpea revealed significantly higher phosphorus uptake by grains over sole coriander but at par with rest of the systems. Higher net returns (120.59 × 103/ha) was recorded in chickpea + coriander (4: 2) over sole chickpea and sole coriander. Chickpea + coriander (4: 2), being at par with sole coriander, recorded significantly higher benefit: cost ratio (3.42). Phosphorus levels resulted in significantly higher chickpea-equivalent yields, LER, RCC, production efficiency and phosphorus uptake by grains than that of the control, but differences between the phosphorus levels were non-significant on these aspects. Competition ratio followed reverse trend and significantly lower competition ratio was observed at higher dose of phosphorus but difference amongst the phosphorus levels was not significant. However, higher benefit: cost ratio was observed owing to 30 kg P2O5 + phosphate-solubilizing bacteria/ha (2.65).

Keywords

Aggressivity, Chickpea-equivalent yield, Competition ratio, Land-equivalent ratio, Production efficiency, Relative crowding coefficient