Indian Journal of Agronomy
  • Year: 2021
  • Volume: 66
  • Issue: 2

Effect of irrigation scheduling and organic manures on yield and economics of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

  • Author:
  • H.P. Verma1, O.P. Sharma2, Seema Sharma3, Rajesh Kumar4, Pappu Khatik5
  • Total Page Count: 5
  • Page Number: 186 to 190

1Technical Assistant, Mechanized Agriculture Farm, Agriculture University, Kota, Ummedganj, Rajasthan, 324 001

2Emeritus Professor, Department of Agronomy, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner, Rajasthan, 303 329

3Associate Professor, Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute Durgapura, SKNAU, Jobner, Rajasthan, 302 018

4Assistant Professor, Mechanized Agriculture Farm, Agriculture University, Kota, Ummedganj, Rajasthan, 324 001

5Technical Assistant, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Baran, Agriculture University, Kota, Rajasthan-324 001

Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, Rajasthan-303 329

*Corresponding author's Email: hppersoya.p@gmail.com

Online published on 16 October, 2021.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) seasons of 2014–15 and 2015–16 at Jobner, Rajasthan to study the effect of irrigation scheduling and organic manures on growth, yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under loamy sand soil. The treatments consisted of 5 irrigation scheduling, i.e. I1, (irrigation at critical stages); I2, [0.9 irrigation water: cumulative pan evaporation (IW: CPE ratio); I3, 0.6 IW: CPE ratio at vegetative phase + 0.8 IW: CPE ratio at reproductive phase; I4, 0.6 IW: CPE ratio at vegetative phase + 1.0 IW: CPE ratio at reproductive phase; and I5, 0.8 IW: CPE ratio at vegetative phase + 1.0 IW: CPE ratio at reproductive phase in main plots and 4 organic manures, viz. control (M0), FYM @ 15 t/ha (M1), VC @ 6 t/ha (M2) and FYM @ 7.5 t + VC @ 3 t/ha (M3) in subplots. The experiment was conducted in splitplot design with 4 replications. The pooled results showed that irrigation applied at 0.9 IW: CPE ratio (I2) resulted in the maximum yield (grain, straw, biological and harvest index) and net returns, being superior to I1, I4 and I3 treatments except treatment I5. The treatment I2 exhibited the maximum value of consumptive use (395 mm). However, the treatment I5 revealed significantly highest water-use efficiency WUE of 11.34 kg/ha-mm and excelled over rest of the treatments. Application of FYM at 7.5 t/ha + vermicompost at 3 t/ha (M3) resulted in significantly higher yield (grain, straw, biological and harvest index) which was at par with M2 and superior to rest of the treatments. The highest consumptive use (409 mm) by the crop was recorded under the treatment M0. Significantly highest WUE was recorded under M3 (12.40 kg/ha-mm). The maximum net returns (55,276) was recorded under the treatment M3 (FYM @ 7.5 t/ha + vermicompost @ 3 t/ha) which remained at par with M1 but significantly higher to M0 and M2 treatment. Thus, scheduling of irrigation to wheat either at 0.9 IW: CPE throughout the growth or 0.8 IW: CPE at vegetative phase + 1.0 IW: CPE at reproductive phase resulted significantly higher yields (grain, straw, biological and harvest index) and net returns. Irrigating the crop at an IW: CPE of 0.8 at vegetative phase + IW: CPE of 1.0 at reproductive phase was most effective as the above schedule besides producing almost equal yields also curtailed 1 irrigation with highest WUE. Manuring the crop either with 7.5 t FYM + 3 t/ha VC or 6 t/ha VC were the equally effective and net returns.

Keywords

Farm yard manure, Harvest index, Irrigation scheduling, Net returns, Vermicompost, Wateruse efficiency, Yield