Indian Journal of Applied Basic Medical Sciences

Open Access
  • Year: 2014
  • Volume: 16b
  • Issue: 23

Comparision study of Intrathecal Inj. Ropivacaine (0.75%) Isobaric 1.5 cc V/s Inj. Ropivacaine (0.75%) Isobaric 2.5 cc for lower limb surgery for very high risk group of patients

  • Author:
  • Nandan B. Upadhyay1, Ashish B. Chavada2, Niraj M. rathod3, Rina A. Gadhavi4, Tejas M. Patel5, Komal K. Makwana6
  • Total Page Count: 6
  • DOI:
  • Page Number: 27 to 32

1Associate Professor, Department of anesthesia , C.U. Shah medical college, Surendranagar, Email- upadhyaya.nb@rediffmail.com, Mobile: 9879587444

22nd year resident, Department of anesthesia, C.U. Shah medical college, Surendranagar

31st year resident, Department of anesthesia, C.U. Shah medical college, Surendranagar, Email: drnmrathod@gmail.com, Mobile: 8128652117

4Professor & Head, Department of anesthesia, C.U. Shah medical college, Surendranagar

5Tutor, Department of anesthesia, C.U. Shah medical college, Surendranagar

6Assistant Prof., Department of Physiology, C.U. Shah medical college, Surendranagar, Emaild rkomalmakwana@gmail.com, Mobile: 8128652118

Abstract

The spinal anesthesia is associated with heamodynamic instability and its consequences in very high risk ASA grade 3 and 4 patients posted for ORIF in fracture neck femur and intertrochanteric fracture. Isobaric ropivacaine has better heamodynamic stability compare to hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia. Regional anesthesia in form of lumbar and sacral plexus block has its own limitations

Optimal dose of isobaric ropivacaine spinal anesthesia for patient safety

In our comparative observational study 25 patients of ASA grade 3 and ASA grade 4 taken in each group of age above 55 years. In group A Inj. ropivacaine 1.5 cc of 0.75% isobaric, and in Group-B Inj. ropivacaine 2.5 cc of 0.75% isobaric given L3-L4 interspace Intrathecal with spinal needle no 25 along with epidural catheter insertion. All hemodynamic parameter recorded like pulse, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure at 5, 10, 15 min interval.

With using unpaired t test and p value indicate, there is no advantage of very low dose of ropivacaine intrathecally for hemodynamic stability in very high risk group of patients. Study indicate there are no advantages of using very low dose of intrathecall ropivacaine in high-risk group A patients Vs group B patients.

There is no advantage of very low dose of ropivacaine intrathecally for hemodynamic stability in very high group of patients

Keywords

isobaric ropivacaine, spinal anesthesia, hemodynamic stability