1Directorate of Research, Department of Zoology and Aquaculture, CCS HAU, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India
2Entomology, CCS HAU, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India
3Maths & Statistics, CCS HAU, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India
Department of Zoology and Aquaculture, CCS HAU, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India
*Corresponding author's e-mail: asha.poonia@gmail.com
Online published on 5 December, 2015.
In the present investigation, two sampling methods for V. destructor; hive debris and sticky paper method was compared year around in A. mellifera colonies to know the viable method. Between the two methods, sticky paper method was found significantlybetter (CD = 0.11; p = 0.05). More mitefallwas recorded in sticky paper method(17.58 mites/hive) than in hive debris sampling (11.41 mites/hive). Fortnightly data analysis showed two peaks of Varroa; one in second fortnight of May and other in first fortnight of July in both sampling methods. Maximum number of mites (63.27 mites/hive) was recorded in second fortnight of Mayin both sampling methodswhich wassignificantlyhigher than the mites recordedat other observation periods (CD = 0.38; p = 0.05).
Apis mellifera, Colony strength, Hive debris, Sticky paper method, Varroa destructor