Indian Journal of Agricultural Research
SCOPUSWeb of Science
  • Year: 2025
  • Volume: 59
  • Issue: 2

Effect of crop geometry and nutrient management approaches on yield and quality of transplanted finger millet

  • Author:
  • A. Aliveni1,*, B. Venkateswarlu1, M. Sree Rekha1, P.R.K. Prasad1, K. Jayalalitha1
  • Total Page Count: 5
  • Page Number: 234 to 238

1Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College, Bapatla-522 101, Andhra Pradesh, India

*Corresponding Author: A. Aliveni, Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College, Bapatla-522 101, Andhra Pradesh, India, Email: aliveni165@gmail.com

Online published on 1 July, 2025.

Abstract

An ideal crop geometry is essential for obtaining optimum plant stand in the field as the yield of a crop depends on the final plant density with effective utilization of growth resources. Conjunctive use of chemical fertilizers and organic manures is important to maintain and sustain soil fertility and crop productivity. Nutrient Management system is gaining importance among the farmers and it is advisable to optimize the use of inorganic fertilizers along with organic manures for getting high yields of better quality besides keeping the production cost at sustainable level. The current field study was aimed to evaluate the impact of various crop geometries and nutrient management treatments on yield and quality of transplanted finger millet.

A Field experiment was conducted at Agricultural college farm, Bapatla during the kharif seasons of 2018 and 2019 and the experimental design was split plot with three replications. The main-plot factor comprised of three crop geometries with different age of seedlings and seven nutrient management practices in subplots.

The experimental results indicated that significantly higher grain and straw yields with good quality grain of finger millet were recorded in the spacing of 30 × 10 cm fb 30 × 30 cm spacing and among the nutrient management approaches application of FYM @ 10 tonnes ha-1 + 125% RDF along with wooden log treatment (S6) recorded the highest yield and however was statistically comparable with 125% of RDF + FYM (S5).

Keywords

Crop geometry, Finger millet, Nutrient management approach, Quality, Yield