International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management
  • Year: 2023
  • Volume: 14
  • Issue: 2

Role of Differential Nutrient Management on Growth and Yield Attributes of Cashew (Anacardium occidetale L.) in Maidan Tracts of Karnataka

  • Author:
  • B. N. Rajendra1,*, R. K. Ramachandra2, N. Ashwathnarayana Reddy3, M. K. Honnabyraiah4, Vishnuvardhana5, S. L. Jagadeesh6, B. Anjaneya Reddy7, M. Ramesh8, B. Subramanyam8
  • Total Page Count: 6
  • Page Number: 237 to 242

1Dept. of Fruit Science, AICRP on Cashew, Horticulture Research and Extension Centre, Hogalagere, Kolar, Karnataka, (563 138), India

2Dept. of Genetics and Plant Breeding, AICRP on Cashew, Horticulture Research and Extension Centre, Hogalagere, Kolar, Karnataka, (563 138), India

3Dept. of Horticulture Entomology, College of Horticulture, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, (563 101), India

4Dept. of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture, Yelawala, Mysore, Karnataka, (571 130), India

5Dept. of Plantation Spices Medicinal and Aromatic Crops, College of Horticulture, Yelawala, Mysore, Karnataka, (571 130), India

6Dept. of Post Harvest Technology, Regional Horticulture Research and Extension Centre, UHS Campus, GKVK, Bengaluru, Karnataka, (563 101), India

7Dept. of Horticulture Plant pathology, Horticulture Research and Extension Centre, Hogalagere, Kolar, Karnataka, (563 138), India

8AICRP on Cashew, Horticulture Research and Extension Centre, Hogalagere, Kolar, Karnataka, (563 138), India

*Corresponding Email: raju4871@gmail.com

Online Published on 23 August, 2023.

Abstract

The research on Nutrient Management for yield maximization in Cashew was conducted under Crop management, All India Co-ordinated Research Project (AICRP) on Cashew at Horticulture Research and Extension Centre, Hogalagere, Kolar district, Karnataka state, India during the period of 2020–21. There were six treatments imposed in the experiment, among the treatments, treatment-5 (T5) i.e ., cashew trees imposed with 100% RDF (500:250:250 g)+10 kg FYM along with foliar spray of major nutrients (3% Urea+0.5% MAP+1% K2SO4), secondary and micronutrients (0.5% ZnSo4+0.1% solubor as boron+0.5% MgSo4) was found significantly superior over remaining treatments in terms of growth parameters like Stem girth (17.91 cm), Canopy height (2.66 m), Canopy spread (E-W : 7.08 m except T4 and N-S : 7.12 m), Mean canopy diameter (7.10 m), Canopy surface area (158.55 m2) and ground area covered by plant canopy (61.99%). Whereas, T5 was also recorded significantly superior over other treatments and followed similar trend as in growth attributing parameters, such as Nut yield per tree (14.50 kg), Yield per hectare ( 18.87 q), Cumulative nut yield for six years of harvest (56.82 kg) and Cumulative yield per hectare (88.64 q). However the treatment-5 was also numerically elevated higher values in remaining all parameters and the lowest observation values were found in T6 (control). When look at the overall performance, treatment-5 (T5) was found to be best treatment.

Keywords

Cashew, Major nutrients, Secondary nutrients, Micronutrients, Cashew apple