Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia
  • Year: 2016
  • Volume: 3
  • Issue: 2

“Light wand-guided nasotracheal intubation in patients with limited mouth opening: a comparison with blind nasal intubation”

  • Author:
  • Subhash1, Vipin Kumar Dhama2, Bhagat Singh3, Yogesh Manik4, Nikhil Dewan5,
  • Total Page Count: 5
  • Page Number: 191 to 195

1Professor Head, LLRM Medical College, Meerut

2Associate Professor, LLRM Medical College, Meerut

3Professor, LLRM Medical College, Meerut

4Assistant Professor, LLRM Medical College, Meerut

5Junior Resident, LLRM Medical College, Meerut

*Corresponding Author: Email: ndewan_24@yahoo.co.in

Online published on 15 September, 2016.

Abstract

Approximately 1–3% of surgical patients have difficult airways, which accounts for the most important cause of anaesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. The fibreoptic bronchoscope is considered the gold standard for the management of difficult airways. However, blind nasal intubation remains a basic technique in developing countries, especially in remote areas where a Fiberoptic bronchoscope is not always available. The light wand is a simple, cost effective device, and has become a tool widely accepted in airway management under various clinical scenarios, including difficult airways.

The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of light wand-guided nasotracheal intubation over blind nasal intubation.

A total of 60 ASA Grade I & II patients of age 18–60 yrs of Body mass index between 18–25 kg/m2 with limited mouth opening (distance between upper and lower central incisors < 3.0 cm) posted for elective surgeries were divided into two equal groups in a randomized, double-blind fashion.

30 patients

30 patients

The first attempt and overall success rate of light wand guided nasotracheal intubation was 80% and 90% respectively, significantly higher than blind nasal intubation i.e. 50% and 66.66% respectively (p<0.05). The mean intubation time in light wand group was 103±61 seconds and was 155±73 seconds in blind nasal group (p<0.05). There was significantly better haemodynamic stability and a lower incidence of pharyngalgia in lightwand group.

The study shows nasotracheal intubation using the light wand to be a more effective and simple approach than blind nasal intubation, with a higher success rate, better haemodynamic stability, and fewer postoperative complications in patients with a known or anticipated difficult airway.

Keywords

Adult, Blind nasotracheal intubation, Transillumination