1Assistant Professor, Dept. of Biochemistry, D. Y. Patil Medical College, Kolhapur, Maharashta,
2Professor & HOD, Dept. of Biochemistry, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India
3Professor, Dept. of Nephrology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India
*Corresponding Author: Email: drchandru21@gmail.com
Online published on 2 January, 2019.
In recent years the burden of chronic kidney disease has increased worldwide. End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) needs Hemodialysis as a common renal replacement therapy to reduce its morbidity and mortality. Hemodialysis adequacy must be maintained for effective treatment and is measured either by Urea Kinetic Model (Kt/V), Urea Reduction Ratio (URR), natural log Kt/V or Daugirdas 2nd generation formula. Though Kt/V is accurate, URR is commonly used in clinical practice because of its simplicity and clear concept.
To estimate and compare URR with single pool Kt/V in assessing hemodialysis adequacy.
An experimental prospective study consisting of 100 ESRD patients of either sex between 18–70 years, who were on hemodialysis maintenance. Blood urea was estimated by GLDH-urease method and serum creatinine by Jaffe's method. Values were substituted in URR and Kt/V formula.
There was a significant difference in serum Urea levels after dialysis treatment (P< 0.05). The values of URR and kinetic model of urea (Kt/V) were near to adequacy guidelines set by National Kidney Foundation: KDOQI. URR showed positive correlation with Kt/V. Since the URR and Kt/V are closely related, their predictive power in terms of patient outcome is similar. However, use of Kt/V and urea modelling allows for comparing expected with predicted dialysis dose that can be used to analyse dialysis treatment and dialyzer clearance.
Urea reduction ratio, Kt/V, ESRD, Hemodialysis adequacy, Renal Dialysis, Urea