Indian Journal of Comparative Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases
  • Year: 2014
  • Volume: 35
  • Issue: 2

A comparative evaluation of four detection tests and the isolation of coagulase-negative staphylococci from subclinical mastitis cases in south Indian cattle

  • Author:
  • S. Sundareshan1, S. Isloor, Y. Hari Babu2, B. Awati1, R. Hegde4, R. Sunagar3, C.B. Waryah5, J. Gogoi-Tiwari5, T.K. Mukkur5, N.R. Hegde3
  • Total Page Count: 6
  • Page Number: 73 to 78

1Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Veterinary College, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Nandinagar, Bidar

2Karnataka Vet., Animal and Fisheries Sci. Univ., Nandinagar, Bidar

3Ella Foundation, Genome Valley, Shameerpet Mandal, Hyderabad

4Institute of Animal Health and Vet. Biologicals, Hebbal, Bengaluru

5Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia-6102

Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Veterinary College, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Hebbal, Bengaluru – 560 024

*Corresponding Author: Email: kisloor@rediffmail.com

Online published on 23 January, 2015.

Abstract

Subclinical mastitis (SCM) is an important condition affecting quality milk production. Several coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) have recently been identified to be associated with SCM throughout the world. Studies on comparative evaluation of tests to detect SCM or the contribution of CoNS to SCM in India are lacking. This study evaluated 313 milk samples from organized and unorganized sectors in Somatic Cell Count (SCC), Electrical Conductivity (EC), California Mastitis Test (CMT) and Bromothymol Blue (BTB) tests to detect SCM, and correlated SCM status with isolation of CoNS. Considering standard cut-off values, 44.7%, 48.2%, 21.4% and 26.8% of the samples indicated SCM status by SCC, EC, CMT and BTB tests, respectively. Whereas sensitivity was poor (32.86–41.42%) for all the tests, specificity was poor for EC (45.09%) but good for CMT (87.86%) and BTB (84.97%). When assessed by both of a pair of tests, or all the three tests, specificity was very high (>90%) but sensitivity was very poor (14–30%). When tested by either of a pair of tests, both sensitivity and specificity were poor to average (44–57% and 36–73%, respectively). Isolation of CoNS and SCM status correlated in the case of SCC and EC but not CMT and BTB tests. The results suggest that CMT and BTB tests are the best field tests. Furthermore, a combination of tests is not advisable given the high rate of both false and negative results to identify SCM, and that CoNS may or may not play a role in SCM.

Keywords

Subclinical mastitis, Mastitis detection tests, Coagulase Negative Staphylococci