International Journal of Contemporary Surgery
  • Year: 2016
  • Volume: 4
  • Issue: 2

Sacrospinous Hysteropexy (SSH) as the Primary Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Pilot Study

  • Author:
  • Savita Verma1,, Rekha Bharti2, Karishma Thariani3, Aruna Batra4, Achla Batra5, Abha Aggarwal6
  • Total Page Count: 4
  • Page Number: 8 to 11

1Assistant Professor, Obstetrics   Gynaecology, Shaikhul Hind Maulana Mahmood Hasan Medical College, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh

2Assistant Professor, Obstetrics   Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College   Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi

3Assistant Professor, Obstetrics   Gynaecology, Lady Harding Medical College   Smt. Sucheta Kriplani Hospital, New Delhi

4Professor, Obstetrics   Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical   Health Sciences, SGT University, Budhera, Gurgaon, Haryana

5Consultant   Professor, Obstetrics   Gynaecology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College   Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi

6Scientist F, National Institute of Medical Statistics, ICMR, New Delhi

*Corresponding author: Dr Savita Verma, Assistant Professor, Shaikhul Hind Maulana Mahmood Hasan Medical College, Saharanpur, email: idsavita. sathi@gmail.com

Online published on 12 August, 2016.

Abstract

To study and access the role of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy as a primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse in terms of anatomical outcomes, surgical efficiency, complications, quality of life issues such as urinary, defecatory and sexual functions and overall patient satisfaction.

Twenty women with stage 2–4 uterine descent were included in the study and underwent SSH. Anatomical outcomes (using POPQ), surgical efficiency (Blood-loss, Operative-time), complications, quality-of-life (validated questionnaires: PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7) and overall patient satisfaction (Likert's scale) were measured. Follow-up was done at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months.

SSH was found to have excellent surgical efficiency, with the mean blood loss of 209±79.96 ml and the intra-operative time of 93.2 ± 28.1 minutes. There were no immediate complications, only one delayed complication associated with procedure was buttock pain at 1-month which got relieved at 6-month. The functional outcomes were also good, with 84% improvement in both PFDI and PFIQ scores. Dyspareunia was complained by 6.25% women. There were few recurrent prolapse of the apical compartment at 6 month (30%). 65% of patients recommended SSH to other patients whereas 20% were neutral. Overall patient satisfaction rate was found to be 85%.

SSH is associated with excellent surgical efficiency, good functional outcomes/quality of life and high patient satisfaction but few recurrent apical prolapse.

Keywords

Sacrospinous Hysteropexy, Evaluation, Anatomical Outcomes, Pelvic floor distress inventory-20, Pelvic floor impact questionaire-7