Indian Journal of Entomology
Open Access
SCOPUSWeb of Science
  • Year: 2024
  • Volume: 86
  • Issue: 4

Evaluation of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) attractants in northeastern Ethiopia

  • Author:
  • Aderajew Mihretie1,*, Yitbarek Weldehawariat2, Merkuz Abera3
  • Total Page Count: 5
  • Published Online: Apr 4, 2025
  • Page Number: 1046 to 1050

1Adet Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia

2Addis Ababa University, Department of Zoological Studies, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

3Bahir Dar University, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

*Email: yemihretie@gmail.com (corresponding author): ORCID ID 0000-0002-9152-2634

Online published on 4 April, 2025.

Abstract

A study was conducted in South Wollo and North Wollo administrative zones of northeastern Ethiopia in 2018; Torula yeast, protien hydrolase, methyl eugenol, trimed lure and terpinyil acetate were evaluated for adult fruit fly species complexes trapping. Four fruit fly species was trapped; Bactrocera dorsalis, Ceratitis cosyra, Ceratitis capitata and Ceratitis fasciventris. Bactrocera dorsalis was the most abundant species accounted for 97.9% of the total trapped adults. The number of B. dorsalis C. cosyra and C. capitata showed a significant difference among trapping locations and attractants; The highest number of B. dorsalis was trapped with methyl eugenol at Kalu (722.2 flies/ trap/ week); C. capitata was higher at Habru which was guava and coffee dominated habitat while C. cosyra was relatively higher at Kobo which is mango dominated; more adults were trapped in male lure traps (97.03%) than food-based attractants (2.97%); food-based attractants could be valuable alternatives for detection and monitoring of fruit flies.

Keywords

Attractants, Bactrocera dorsalis, Ceratitis fasciventris, Ceratitis capitata, Ceratitis cosyra, Methyl eugenol, Protein hydrolase, Trimed lure, Torula yeast, Wollo