International Journal of Economic Plants
  • Year: 2024
  • Volume: 11
  • Issue: 2

In-vitro and In-vivo fungicidal evaluation against false smut (Ustilaginoidea virens) of rice

  • Author:
  • Somshetty Ravali1, S. Ameer Basha1,*, T. Kiran Babu2, Y. Chandra Mohan3, S. N. C. V. L. Pushpavalli4, Banoth Balaji Naik5
  • Total Page Count: 7
  • Page Number: 93 to 99

1Dept. of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad (500 030), India

2Dept. of Plant Pathology, Institute of Rice Research, Agricultural Research Station, Rajendranagar, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad (500 030), India

3Dept. of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Institute of Rice Research, Agricultural Research Station, Rajendranagar, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad (500 030), India

4Dept. of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Institute of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad (500 030), India

5Dept. of Agronomy, Regional Sugar Cane and Rice Research Station, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rudrur, Nizamabad, Telangana (503 188), India

*Corresponding Author S. Ameer Basha e-mail: ameerplantpath@gmail.com

Online published on 30 July, 2024.

Abstract

The study was undertaken at two locations during kharif (June to October, 2021), at College Farm, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, and Regional Sugar Cane and Rice Research Station, Rudrur, Nizamabad, to find out the most effective crop stage for managing false smut of rice through fungicide spraying. Our study evaluated three fungicides viz., propiconazole 25 EC, carbendazim 50% WP, and tebuconazole 50%+trifloxystrobin 25% w/w WG (75 WG) against false smut disease of rice under in vitro and field condition. Under in vitro, U. virens showed greater sensitive to tebuconazole+trifloxystrobin, with complete mycelial growth inhibition at minimum concentration (0.25 μg ml−1), followed by propiconazole (1 μg ml−1) and carbendazim (2.5 μg ml−1). Under field management, fungicides propiconazole 25 EC @ 1 ml l−1, carbendazim 50% WP @ 1 g l−1, and tebuconazole 50%+trifloxystrobin 25% w/w WG (75 WG) @ 0.8 g l−1 were sprayed at different crop growth stages (10% panicle emergence, 50% panicle emergence and a combination of both crop stages). The results indicated that two sprays of fungicides, first at 10% panicle emergence and another at 50% panicle emergence were more effective, followed by a single spray at 10% panicle emergence and 50% panicle emergence. Among the three fungicides, tebuconazole 50%+trifloxystrobin 25% w/w WG (75 WG) at 0.8 g l−1 was highly effective in reducing the false smut disease intensity and increasing the yield compared to control.

Keywords

Rice, Ustilaginoidea virens, Propiconazole, Carbendazim, Tebuconazole+trifloxystrobin