1Technician “C’’ National Institute of Virology, Bangalore, India
2Department of Microbiology, Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences, Melmaruvathur, 603319, India
3Department of Biochemistry, Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences, Melmaruvathur, 603319, India
4Research Assistant, RMRC (ICMR), Port Blair, Andaman & Nicobar Island, India
*Corresponding author Email: drsenthiledu@gmail.com
Clindamycin has been used successfully to treat pneumonia and soft tissue infections caused by methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus. However, Clinical failure of clindamycin therapy has been reported due to multiple mechanisms that confer resistance to Macrolide, Lincosamine and Streptogramin antibiotics.
A total of 96 staphylococcal isolates from different clinical specimens were tested for inducible clindamycin resistance by the diskdiffusion induction test using erythromycin (15μg) disk and clindamycin (2μg) disc placed 15mm (edge to edge).
Inducible clindamycin resistance was detected in 47.22% of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates and in 21.67% of methicillinsensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolates. In our setting, clindamycin is safe and effective agent to treat both systemic sand localized Staphylococcal infections, but we recommend that staphylococci isolates, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, are tested by the Dtest routinely to avoid treatment failure.
Inducible clindamycin resistance, Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, D test