Consequence of Early Versus Late Cord Clamping on Neonatal Outcome

To examine the consequence of early versus delayed cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcome. As part of the effective leadership of the third phase of labor in the advanced globe, ECC has become daily exercise without academic evaluation of its prospective effect on the health and growth of a newborn. In addition, ECC is thought to considerably reduce the danger of PPH as part of the active management of the third level of labor.

Because many effective leadership procedures include ECC, some suggest that DCC may boost the danger of PPH. On the contrary, in order to induce numerous neonatal benefits, the recent protocol proposed by WHO to manage the third stage of labor replaced the ECC by DCC.

Despite these extensive evidence, though, there are variations in the view and exercise of late cord clamping. This is not far-fetched as there are still concerns of postpartum haemorrhage maternal danger and neonatal jaundice risk

1. Compare early cell clamping on neonatal results to determine the impacts of postponed cell

clamping.

2. Primary results were intrapartum maternal blood loss evaluation, 72 hours after conception, neonatal packed cell volume and serum bilirubin.

This was a potential, consent was obtained under the category of inclusion criteria.

Women who delivered a term infant (≥ 37 completed weeks of gestation) by normal vaginal delivery at Sree Balaji Medical college and hospital.