Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development
  • Year: 2019
  • Volume: 10
  • Issue: 3

Physical Fitness and Anthropometric Characteristics in School Children: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Areas in East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia

  • Author:
  • Hanisah Azahari1, Mohamad Razali Abdullah2,3,, Ahmad Bisyri Husin Musawi Maliki2, Vijayamurugan Eswaramoorthi1, Hafizan Juahir3, Rabiu Muazu Musa2, Khairi Zawi4
  • Total Page Count: 5
  • Page Number: 619 to 623

1Lecturer, School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 21300, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia

2Lecturer, Faculty of Applied Social Science, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 21300, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia

3Lecturer, East Coast Environmental Research Institute (ESERI), Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 21300, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia

4Lecturer, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia

*Corresponding Author: Mohamad Razali Abdullah, Lecturer, Faculty of Applied Social Science, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 21300, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia, Email: razali896@yahoo.com

Online published on 20 March, 2019.

Abstract

The objective of the study is to compare physical fitness between urban and rural school children and to determine relationship between body mass index and physical fitness primary school children in east coast of Peninsular Malaysia. This study is a cross-sectional study and conducted in primary schools. Anthropometric measurement involved weight and height measurement, and body mass index (BMI) calculation. Fitness test that were measured are power and flexibility. Power was measured by using Standing Broad Jump (SBJ), and flexibility test was measured using Sit and Reach Test (SRT). Total number of subjects were 14880, 71% (n=10532) were classified in normal BMI, and remaining 10% (n=1423) were in obesity; 9% (n=1303) were overweight, 8% (n=1164) were underweight; and 3% (n=458) were in severe thinness. In school area category, 59% (n=8769) rural school children and 41% (n=6111) urban school children. In conclusion, the current study found flexibility had shown a difference in area of school where urban school children performed slightly better than that of rural with F-value 2.09 (Pr>F= 0.15; p<0.05). It also showed a significant negative correlation between BMI and power (r=-0.12) with p-value was 0.0001. However, there was no significant difference in power with areas of school, and no correlation between flexibility and BMI.

Keywords

Body mass index, Fitness, Flexibility, Power, Primary school children