1Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive and community dentistry, Bapuji dental college and Hospital, Davangere-577004
2Professor and head, Department of Preventive and community dentistry. K.L.E.S's Institute of dental sciences, Nehru Nagar, Belgaum.
3Reader, Department of Preventive and community dentistry, Bapuji dental college and Hospital, Davangere-577004.
4Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, S.S.Institute of Medical Sciences & Research centre, Davangere-577005& Karnataka (India)
Online published on 19 November, 2012.
Tongue scraping and brushing have been appreciated for hundreds of years but are still appreciated or used by the public. Scientific evidence has validated the need to practice habitual and tongue cleaning as part of daily home oral hygiene procedures. Objective: To assess and compare the effect of tongue scraping and tongue brushing on oral Mutans streptococci level. Methods: 20 healthy subjects aged 14 to 15 years were randomly selected. Flat plastic tongue scraper and Nylon multitufted small headed tooth brush are the two tongue cleaning devise used. Unstimulated salivary samples were obtained at 4 intervals from each individual. Salivary samples were inoculated on Mitis Salivary Agar Plate and Sorbital Broth was used for identification of Mutans streptococci group. Results: Paired and unpaired ‘t’ test were employed. Reduiction in the Mutans streptococci level from 48.4X104 CFU and 38.3X104 CFU at baseline in tongue scraping and tongue brushing group respectively to 0.34X104 and 0.39X104 CFU after 7th day. Conclusion: Both tongue coating removal methods evaluated were efficient in reducing Mutans streptococci level. This implies that physical removal of the coating on the dorsum of the tongue is important and not the method used for the same.
Tongue scraping, Tongue brushing, Tongue cleaning, Mutans streptococci