Reviews the communication impairment in learning new math books from the perspective grade teachers and experts-courses first

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship injury in training new math books written from the perspective of the first elementary school teachers and experts in Isfahan, 93–1392. So using a stratified random sampling of 270 experts and teachers in the academic year 93–92 were selected. The research is descriptive - and the instrument used was a questionnaire consisting of 56 questions Reliability of which 98.9 percent was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. Its validity and content validity of the use of the Supervisor and a number of experts were approved. The results showed that the most vulnerable communication method of impatience and boredom in the classroom is teacher. (Mean 3/56) and minimal damage to the weakness of the teacher is to believe in the abilities of the students (mean 3/02). According to experts, most damage is related to the inability of communication science in the classroom is the teacher's personality (mean 4/75) and minimum damage of the teacher during the teacher's badinage (mean 3/62).