Analysis of physical health status of faculty and staff in Jinhua

This study attempts to use the physique health test results of faculty and staff as a key issue, and based on the socio-ecological model, analyzes the socio-ecological factors affecting the differences in physical fitness between urban and rural, gender, and different in-service schools. Methods: The physical and mental health of 15 primary and middle schools in Jindong District, Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province (including 2 junior high schools, 4 primary schools, 4 township junior high schools, 4 township primary schools) and the faculty and staff of Jinhua Campus of Zhejiang Normal University were selected. Using SPSS23.0, the chi-square test, independent sample t-test and one-way variance were used to analyze the national physique health test data of the subjects, and the differences in physique between urban and rural areas and between primary and secondary schools were analyzed. Results: 1) In the comparative analysis of faculty and staff in large, middle and primary schools, it was found that body shape indicators are not explicit indicators that distinguish different school levels. There are significant differences in the physical function indicators of the faculty and staff of the large, middle and primary schools. The excellent rate of vital capacity of the university faculty and staff is significantly higher than that of the primary and secondary school teachers. The percentage of the university faculty and staff is generally higher than that of the primary and secondary school teachers. 2) In the physical quality index, the grip strength, the sitting body flexion, the closed eye standing on one leg, and the reaction are dominant indicators. Among them, the grip strength index showed three significant differences among the four groups of female faculty and staff. The seated body flexion test results only showed significant differences among the male faculty and staff over 40 years old. The difference in the step test index only existed in the primary school faculty and staff. Conclusion: The physique of university faculty and staff is significantly better than that of primary and secondary schools. This study attempts to analyze the causes of differences in physique and staff from five levels: individual, family, community, school, and society.