The Kantian categorical imperative and genetic engineering: An overview

The emergence of genetic engineering as a mainstay in the medical sciences has encountered different reactions from both antagonists and protagonists with each group advancing reasons why its opinion should supersede that of the opposing group. The dichotomy mentioned above resulted from the fact that genetic engineering has often been exploited in ways that has aroused strong condemnations and has consequently put protagonists of genetic engineering on the back foot at most discourses on genetic engineering because of the lack of adequate censure on its use. This paper has identified the above mentioned and would propose the “Categorical Imperative” of Immanuel Kant as a form of control on the misuse of genetic engineering in the search for the better life. It would attempt the task at hand by showing that genetic engineering is value-free like all other technological innovations and that it becomes adoptable or condemnable based on the use to which it has been put by scientist and those who seek their expertise. The paper would examine some of the ethical issues arising from genetic engineering and project how its practice can thrive with little or no moral implications.