Indian Journal of Small Ruminants (The)
SCOPUS
  • Year: 2024
  • Volume: 30
  • Issue: 2

Ultrasound application and its effect on quality attributes of marinated goat meat

  • Author:
  • P. Kumar1,6, M.A. Ahmed1, M.N. Hayat2, A.A. Abubakar1, M.M. Rahman3, M.R. Ismail-Fitry3,4, U. Kaka3,5, A.Q. Sazili3,4,*
  • Total Page Count: 6
  • Page Number: 293 to 298

1Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400Upm Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

2Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

3Halal Products Research Institute, Putra Inforport, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

4Department of Food Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

5Department of Companion Animal Medicine and Surgery, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

6Department of Livestock Products Technology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab

*E-mail address: awis@upm.edu.my

Online published on 3 September, 2024.

Abstract

A study was carried out to evaluate the effect of ultrasound application on the physicochemical and sensory characteristics of marinated goat meat. Chunks of semimembranosus muscle were immersed in the marinade and ultrasonicated in an ultrasound bath (280 W, 37 kHz) for 15 (T1), 30 (T2), 45 (T3) and 60 (T4) min. These treated and control samples (without ultrasound application) were kept for 24 h under refrigeration (4±2°C) for marination. Ultrasound-assisted marination had no significant effect on the pH of both raw and cooked meat. Marinade pick up (%) was significantly (P<0.05) higher in T1, T2, T3 and T4 (2.42±0.04, 3.01±0.02, 5.24±0.05 and 5.60±0.023) compared to control (1.96±0.02).Cooking yield (%) was significantly (P<0.05) higher in T1 (64.80±0.20) compared to T2 (63.02±0.18), T3 (62.95±0.21) and T4 (62.96±0.17). Shear force value (kg) was significantly (P<0.05) lower in T1, T2, T3 and T4 (0.842±0.04, 0.744±0.01, 0.623±0.08, 0.637±0.05) compared to control (1.897±0.03). Flavour and tenderness scores were highest in T2 (4.71±0.03 and 4.71±0.04) among all samples. Thus, ultrasound-assisted marination for 30 min (T2) was observed to improve the flavour and tenderness of goat meat.

Keywords

Goat meat, Quality, Sensory analysis, Ultrasound-assisted marination