1department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141004, India
2Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141004, India
*Address for correspondence Dr B.S. Sandhu, department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141004, India, E-mail: bhupisandhu@rediffmail.com
Online published on 12 October, 2020.
The present study was conducted to elucidate the comparison of rabies antibody titer in cattle vaccinated intramuscularly and intradermally with commercially available inactivated rabies vaccine. Twelve adult healthy cows divided into two groups of 6 animals each, were selected for the study and were vaccinated on day 0, 7 and 21. The animals in group I were vaccinated via IM route using 1ml of vaccine, while those of group-II were vaccinated via ID route using 0.1ml of vaccine on a single-site. Antibody titres against rabies were analyzed using the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) on the day of vaccination i. e. day 0, and on 7th, 14th and 28th days post-vaccination. No significant statistical difference (p>0.05) was observed in the animals of the two groups vaccinated via IM and ID route during the entire period of study. All the animals vaccinated via ID and IM routes developed protective level of antibody titre of >0.5 IU/ml on day 14th post-vaccination. ID route of vaccination was more economical as compared to IM route with 90% cost savings attained using ID route for pre-exposure rabies prophylaxis. From the study, it was concluded that intradermal route may be an alternative route for rabies prophylaxis.
Antibody titre, Cattle, ELISA, Intradermal route, Pre-exposure prophylaxis, Rabies