1Scientist, Division of Surgery
2Principal Scientist, Division of Surgery
3Principal Scientist, TEC, ICAR-IVRI, Pune
4P.G. Scholar, Division of Surgery
5Principal Scientist & Head, Division of Surgery
ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122 (UP), India
*Corresponding author; E-mail: drrohits.singh@gmail.com
Online published on 28 May, 2020.
Prospective, randomized clinical trials were performed in sixteen clinical cases of urolithiasis in male goats, managed with two different anaesthetic treatments (A and B). Animals of group A were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (2.5 μg/kg body wt), while in group B dexmedetomidine (2.5 μg/kg body wt) and butorphanol (0.05 mg/kg body wt) were used intravenously. Induction of anaesthesia was achieved by 1% propofol in groups A (2.50 ± 0.37 mg/kg) and B (1.99±0.29 mg/kg). The anaesthesia was maintained with continuous intravenous infusion (CII) of 1% propofol. Infusion rate was adjusted in response to positive reactions to surgical nociceptive stimulation performed during tube cystostomy procedure. In both groups, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and rectal temperature (RT) decreased significantly (P<0.05) in both groups. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased significantly (P<0.05) after premedication, up to the end of observation period in both groups. However, MAP improved at 20 min and onwards but remained significantly (P<0.05) lower than the baseline value up to the end of observation period. It was concluded that both combinations cause significant cardiovascular and respiratory depression and should be adminised carefully in uraemic goats.
Butorphanol, Dexmedetomidine, Goats, Propofol