Journal Of Applied Biology And Biotechnology
Open Access
SCOPUSWeb of Science
  • Year: 2025
  • Volume: 13
  • Issue: 2

Sustainability analysis of the greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) production system

  • Author:
  • Francisco Suazo-López1,2, Claudia Hernández-Aguilar2, José Armando Ramírez-Arias1, Rosalba Zepeda-Bautista2,*, Martha Elena Domínguez-Hernández3
  • Total Page Count: 12
  • Published Online: Jan 9, 2026
  • Page Number: 32 to 43

1Departamento de Preparatoria Agrícola, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Texcoco, Mexico

2Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica Zacatenco, Mexico City, Mexico

3Departamento de Ingeniería y Tecnología, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuautitlán, México

*Corresponding Author Rosalba Zepeda-Bautista, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica Zacatenco, Mexico City, Mexico, Email: rzepedab@ipn.mx

Online published on 9 January, 2026.

Abstract

The sustainability of the tomato production system in greenhouses in the municipal area of Texcoco, Mexico, was evaluated using a cluster analysis for the classification of farmers and the framework for the evaluation of management systems for natural resources, incorporating sustainability indicators to evaluate sustainability. The results showed three groups of farmers considering the technology used in production: low technology level (LTL), medium technology level (MTL), and high. They differed in fruit yield (230.19 tons ha-1 year-1 on average), cost-benefit rate (1.31 on average), organization, water management, and greenhouse surface and equipment. Productivity was the attribute that affected sustainability the most since yield is a complex variable due to the conjunction of natural, human, and financial resources that affect the environmental, social, and technological dimensions. Fruit yield was slightly higher than the reference value (180.32 tons ha-1 year-1) at 53.53%, 18.44% and 1.8% in the high, medium, and low technological level clusters, respectively, whereas net income and the cost-benefit rate had lower values than the reference (1034326 MEX$ and 1.62, respectively) for the LTL and MTL clusters. The information obtained helps generate a baseline and strategies to improve the sustainability of the system.

Keywords

Cost-Benefit Rate, Farmer Organization, Fruit Yield, Technology Level, Water Management