Journal of Animal Research
  • Year: 2021
  • Volume: 11
  • Issue: 1

Comparative Study of Automation and Conventional System on Production Performance in Poultry Farms

  • Author:
  • Abhijeet Kumar1,*, Prasanna Somerahally Basavaraju2, Subhash Patlapati Mahesh3, V. Malathi4, Mahadevappa D Gouri5, Jayanaik4, Vivek M Patil7, Jaya Nagappa Lakkundi8, Ranjith Roy Yadav9, Prabha Karan10
  • Total Page Count: 11
  • Published Online: Sep 21, 2022
  • Page Number: 187 to 197

1Central Poultry Development Organization and Training InstituteHessarghatta, Bangalore, India

10Class Veterinary Hospital, Girihinda Chowk, Govt of Bihar, India

2Department of Livestock Production Management, Veterinary College, Hebbal, Bangalore, India

3Central Poultry Development Organization and Training Institute, Hessarghatta, Bangalore, India

4Department of Poultry Science Veterinary College, Hebbal, Bangalore, India

5Department of Livestock Farm Complex, Veterinary College Hebbal, Bangalore, India

7Livestock Research Instruction Complex, Deoni Farm, Veterinary College, Bidar, India

8Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Veterinary College, Hebbal, Bangalore, India

9MVSc Scholars Department of Livestock Production Management, Veterinary College, Hebbal>, Bangalore, India

*Corresponding author: Kumar A; E-mail: dr.abhikumar0501@gmail.com

Online Published on 21 September, 2022.

Abstract

The study was conducted to compare the productivity performance of Layer breeder under conventional house and automatic house. Both houses were studied under small farms with an average of 250 birds. This study covered a period of 22 weeks with five replicates. Based on the results, the effect of different rearing systems on the mean body weight and FCR from week eighteen to forty weeks of age on weekly and cumulative basis were significantly (P<0.05) influenced among the various treatment groups in HH-260 birds. Egg production, Hen housed and hen day egg production in experimental birds in automatic rearing system was significantly different from birds reared in conventional rearing system. The study also concluded that ARS birds had better liveability as compared to birds under conventional rearing systems. Litter quality analyzed based on the proximate analysis and E. coli count and found significant (P<0.01) difference among the two-rearing systems. The proximate analysis of built up litter was significant higher (P<0.01) in CRS than the ARS. The higher proximate values like crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre, total ash and energy value were mainly due to feed wastage in conventional rearing system which leads to elevation of these values. There was highly significant difference (P<0.01) in working time measurement of automation over conventional system of rearing. It accepted the hypothesis of the study that ARS housing have better productivity and profitability over conventional, this is testified by the general better FCR, egg production, liveability and litter quality in CCS houses.

• Impact of rearing system on production parameters of layer breeders was studied.

• Automatic rearing system has significant influence on growth performance, egg production, liveability, litter quality and working time measurement.

Keywords

Feed conversion ratio, Conventional rearing system (CRS), Automatic rearing system (ARS), Litter quality