Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development
  • Year: 2026
  • Volume: 21
  • Issue: 1

Comparative Analysis of Socio-personal, Socio-economic, Communication and Psychological Profiles of Self-help Group and Non-self-help Group Members: Evidence from a Cross-sectional Study

  • Author:
  • Vaishnavi Sakaray1,*, Venu Lenin2, Monika Wason2, Rajat Kumar Nath1, G.S. Mahra3, Mrinmoy Ray4, K.V. Praveen5, Settipalli Sravani1
  • Total Page Count: 7
  • Page Number: 220 to 226

1Ph.D. Research Scholar, Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012

2Principal Scientist, Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012

3Scientist (Senior Scale), Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012

4Scientist (Senior Scale), Division of Forecasting and Agricultural Systems Modelling, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi-110012

5Scientist (Senior Scale), Division of Agricultural Economics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012

*Corresponding author email id: vaishnavisakaray99@gmail.com

Abstract

The Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Rural Livelihood Mission (DAY-NRLM) stands as a prominent flagship initiative of the Government of India, with a core objective of poverty eradication through sustainable livelihood enhancement. The programme primarily targets the social mobilization of rural populations, bringing together members from disadvantaged households preferably women into Self-Help Groups (SHGs). Thus, a study was conducted across four districts in Andhra Pradesh, to examine and compare socio-personal, economic, communication, and socio-psychological attributes of SHG and non-SHG respondents. The findings reveal that SHG members display higher or moderate levels of social participation, risk orientation, economic motivation, credit and extension orientation, while non-members demonstrate lower to moderate levels in these aspects. Educational qualifications, several socio-economic variables (occupation, experience, landholding, consumption expenditure, and proximity to banking), along with all communication and socio-psychological variables, significantly differ between groups, with SHG members consistently performing better. The exception is bank distance, where SHG members report closer proximity. Although a positive relationship exists between SHG participation and educational attainment, causality cannot be determined. Overall, the results underscore the incremental advantages and distinctive socio-economic profiles of SHG members, illustrating the group's potential to foster empowerment and improve livelihoods in rural Andhra Pradesh.

Keywords

Self-help groups, National rural livelihood mission, Poverty alleviation, Microfinance