Journal of Dental and Orofacial Research
  • Year: 2018
  • Volume: 14
  • Issue: 1

Absorbable Gelatin Sponge versus Alloplastic Graft Material as Adjuvants in Direct Sinus Lift Procedures-A Comparative Study

  • Author:
  • M. N. Sushma Sonale1,, Ranganath Krishnappa2, Vibha Shetty3, Kavitha Prasad4, R. M. Lalitha5
  • Total Page Count: 11
  • Page Number: 7 to 17

1Ex Post Graduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru-560054

2Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru-560054

3Professor and Head, Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru-560054

4Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru-560054

5Senior Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru-560054

*Corresponding Author E-Mail: sushmamnsonale@gmail.com

Online published on 18 January, 2019.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the quantity of new bone formed in the maxillary sinus using Abgel versus β-TCP as adjuvants in maxillary sinus lift procedures using lateral window approach. This randomized clinical study was conducted on 14 patients with 16 sites in Misch's SA-4 category, divided into Group A: Absorbable gelatin sponge was used as graft material and Group B: Alloplast (β tricalcium phosphate) was used as graft material. In the Abgel group, 4 sites were augmented with immediate implant placement, whereas 4 sites were augmented without implants, similar to the β-TCP group. CBCT scans were obtained pre operatively, immediate post operatively and 5 months post operatively to assess the quantity of bone formed and the maintenance of membrane elevation achieved post augmentation; both within the group and between the two groups. The 5 months post treatment bone height was significantly higher than pre-treatment bone height (p<0.05) in both the groups: however the mean increase in bone height using β-TCP was not statistically significant when compared to Abgel group (p>0.05). On comparing the post treatment height in membrane elevation measurements (irrespective of the material used), more height loss was seen in group without implants (3.52 ± 2.59) than group with implants (1.46 ± 1.12) which was statistically significant (p<0.05). In conclusion, Abgel is effective as an adjuvant in both with and without immediate implant placement; however the bone height achieved is better in patients with immediate implant placement.

Keywords

Maxillary Sinus Lift, Absorbable Gelatin Sponge, Alloplastic Graft Material, β-Tricalcium Phosphate, Bone Augmentation, Immediate and Delayed Implants