Journal of Entomological Research
SCOPUSWeb of Science
  • Year: 2022
  • Volume: 46
  • Issue: 3

Bioefficacy of conventional and newer insecticides against aphids, M. persicae (Sulzer) of tomato in Varanasi region

  • Author:
  • Rupesh Kumar Gajbhiye*, M. Raghuraman, Ingle Dipak Shyamrao1, Abhinav Kumar
  • Total Page Count: 5
  • Page Number: 576 to 580

1Department of Entomology, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi - 834 006, Jharkhand, India

Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221 005, Uttar Pradesh, India

*Corresponding author's E-mail: rupeshnilu90@gmail.com

Online Published on 11 October, 2022.

Abstract

Nine insecticidal treatments viz., chlorantraniprole 18.5% SC @ 30 g a.i./ha, flubendiamide 39.35% SC @ 48 g a.i./ha, lambda-cyhalothrin 5% EC @ 15 g a.i./ha, Beauveria bassiana @ 1X 1012 spore/ml, NSKE 5% @ 1000 ppm, novaluron (IGR) @ 75 g a.i./ha, imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 30 g a.i./ha, indoxacarb 14.5% SC @ 70 g a.i./ha and spinosad 45% SC @ 70 g a.i./ha were field evaluated against aphids population. Results revealed that foliar spray of imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 30 g a.i./ha was found to be the most effective treatment followed by indoxacarb 14.5% SC @ 70 g a.i./ha and spinosad 45% SC @ 70 g a.i./ha taking into account of its better efficacy against aphids with overall per cent reduction over control of 70.69, 62.92 and 56.04 during year I and 75.55, 66.80 and 63.84 during year II. Minimum population of aphids was recorded in NSKE 5% @ 1000 ppm.

Keywords

Aphids, Bio-efficacy, Imidacloprid 17.8% SL, Indoxacarb 14.5% SC, Tomato