Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology
SCOPUS
  • Year: 2025
  • Volume: 42
  • Issue: 2

Registered Medical Practitioners: Perception of Professional Secrecy

  • Author:
  • Madhusudan R. Petkar1, Sandesh B. Datir2, Ashwinikumar B. Sapate3,*, Ajay Ghangale4, Praveen Arora5, Rahul M. Band6
  • Total Page Count: 7
  • Page Number: 20 to 26

1Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India

2Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India

3Professor (Corresponding Author), Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India

4Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India

5Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Sri Aurobindo University, Indore, India

6Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India

*Corresponding author. E-mail address: fmtabsapate@gmail.com

Online Published on 19 August, 2025.

Abstract

Confidentiality is the foundation of the physician-patient relationship, safeguarded by ethical and legal guidelines globally. This study evaluates Registered Medical Practitioners’ (RMPs) awareness and perception of professional secrecy, which is crucial for preventing legal and ethical violations. This cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted at a tertiary health care teaching hospital, which included 342 RMPs from various specialties. The participants’ knowledge was assessed using a standardized questionnaire, with responses categorized based on accuracy. The findings indicated that while RMPs were well-informed about confidentiality in cases of notifiable diseases (75.43%), their awareness diminished in complex situations such as disclosing patient information to employers, insurers, or in court (71.92% to 60.52% incorrect responses). RMPs showed better understanding when the patient’s guardian or hostel warden was involved (61.11%) but lacked knowledge in areas such as the disclosure of information without patient consent for non-communicable diseases. The study identified gaps in the legal and ethical frameworks guiding professional secrecy, highlighting the need for enhanced training in medical jurisprudence during medical education. Recommendations include mandatory medical jurisprudence training during both undergraduate and postgraduate education to address these knowledge gaps. The study underscores the importance of continuous education to ensure RMPs comply with ethical standards and legal requirements, ultimately safeguarding patient privacy and public health.

Keywords

Registered Medical Practitioner, Professional Secrecy, Confidentiality, Doctor-Patient relationship, Medical Ethics