1Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, United Institute of Medical Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh – 211012
2Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, K.D. Medical College, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh - 281406
3Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, SHKM Govt. Medical College, Nalhar, Haryana – 122107
4Senior Resident, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, AIIMS, Madurai, Tamil Nadu – 625008
*Corresponding author, E-mail address: dixitpraveen104@gmail.com
Online Published on 19 August, 2025.
The word autopsy is derived from the Greek term autopsia, meaning to “see for oneself ” and is the keystone of forensic medicine. The medico-legal autopsies in India are performed at the request of an investigative officer as guided under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, replacing the former Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) 1973. A complete and meticulous autopsy is always necessary, as minor omissions can lead to misinterpretation of findings, affecting judicial outcomes. Post-mortem artefacts and handling-related alterations can further complicate the interpretations, resulting in obscure or negative autopsies where no definitive cause of death is established. Incongruities among forensic experts can sometimes create professional disagreements, yet such wide-ranging outlooks can ultimately enhance justice delivery. This article presents a case series highlighting the significance of preserving trivial evidence, conducting a complete post-mortem examination, and looking at the post-mortem case through an open-eyed approach. Through three post-mortem cases, we demonstrate how scientific rigour, DNA analysis, histopathology, radiology, and toxicology contributed to solving complicated cases. Our findings highlight the need for a systematic and neutral approach in forensic pathology to prevent wrongful accusations and ensure reliable post-mortem examinations.
Forensic medicine, Medico-legal autopsy, DNA analysis, Scientific rigour, Professional disagreements