1Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, AIIMS, Raebareli, UP
2Senior Resident, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, AIIMS, Raebareli, UP
3Associate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, AIIMS, Rajkot, Gujarat
4Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, AIIMS, Rajkot, Gujarat
*Corresponding author. E-mail address: dr.yogendra23@gmail.com
The medico-legal system forms a critical interface between medicine and law, pivotal for the administration of justice. Its integrity, however, is frequently compromised by the absence of standardized protocols and a formal accreditation framework. The integration of robust quality accreditation systems, drawing parallels from established healthcare standards like the National Accreditation Board for Hospitals & Healthcare Providers (NABH) and the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL), is essential to address this deficiency. These standards can also be applicable to certain aspects in the field of forensic - State Forensic Labs and Forensic Histopathology labs. Maintaining healthcare standards and following protocols also reduces the medicolegal burden of hospitals. A structured quality management system is imperative for ensuring precision, accountability, and integrity in all medico-legal procedures. This is particularly crucial for post-mortem examinations, where the implementation of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for autopsy performance, dead body management, chain of custody for sample preservation, and compliant biomedical waste management prevents evidentiary contamination and procedural lapses. Also following a standard reporting format can make sure the quality of reporting is not compromised. Adopting a formal accreditation process would minimize errors, enhance the scientific validity of forensic findings, and ensure uniformity across different centres. A quality-accredited medico-legal framework is fundamental to upholding the principles of justice, ensuring defensibility in court, and strengthening public confidence in both the medical and legal systems.
Medico-legal, Quality, Accreditation, Autopsy, Standardization, Certification