Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science
SCOPUS
  • Year: 2006
  • Volume: 54
  • Issue: 3

Predictability of existing indices and an alternative coefficient for estimating sodicity build-up using Adj.RNa, and permissible limits for crops grown on soils irrigated with waters having residual alkalinity

  • Author:
  • P.S. Minhas, D.R. Sharma
  • Total Page Count: 8
  • Page Number: 331 to 338

Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Kamal, Haryana, 132001

1SARiw = Na+/√(Ca2++Mg2+)/2

Abstract

Various indices in vogue (SAR1, adj.SAR2, adj.RNa3) for determining the sodicity hazards of irrigation waters having residual alkalinity were tested with long-term field data available for different cropping sequences viz., fallow-wheat, paddy-wheat, millet/maize-wheat and cotton-wheat from various parts of north-west India. The EC, SAR, adj.SAR, adj.RNa and RSC of these waters ranged between 0.4–10 dS m−1, 0.6–43 (mmol L−1)½, 0.6–102 (mmol L−1)½, 0.6–57 (mmol L−1)½ and 0–15 me L−1, respectively. Only those data sets were selected for comparisons where the soils had been irrigated with alkali waters for more than 5 years. Empirical relations between exchangeable sodium percent (ESP, 0–0.3 m soil) and above indices like SARiw (R2 = 0.44–0.76), adj.SAR (R2 = 0.45–0.83) and adj.RNa (R2 = 0.36–0.76) could only be employed for particular cropping sequences and there was lack of general validity for pooled data of different rotations (R2 = 0.29–0.31). Even when the leaching fraction (LF) and mineral-weathering coefficient were put into equations, the predictions of sodicity did not improve (R2 = 0.20–0.28). However, the predictability using adj.RNa improved remarkably (R2 = 0.69**) with an alternative coefficient based on annual quantities of alkali waters applied (DIW),the rainfall (DRW) at the site and the evapotranspiration (ET) demands of the crops grown in sequence viz., ESP = (DIW/DRW) (√(1+ DRW/ET) (adj.RNa). Maas & Hoffman type stepwise linear response functions fitted for wheat, paddy, millet/maize and cotton irrigated with alkali waters showed the threshold sodicity levels (ESPt, 0–0.3 m soil) to be 16.2, 20.1, 6.1 and 14.9 while the slopes were 1.86, 1.62, 1.34 and 1.26 per cent/ESP, respectively. Predictions of sodicity, based upon the proposed equation, and the relative yields from sodicity response functions were utilised to propose permissible limits in terms of adj.RNa for the sustainable use of alkali waters for different rainfall regions and the cropping sequences.

Keywords

Salt-affected soils, poor quality water, sodic soils, sodicity indices, saline-sodic conditions monsoon climate