Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

SCOPUS
  • Year: 2025
  • Volume: 73
  • Issue: 1

Rapid Prediction of Soil Electrical Conductivity in the Middle Indo-Gangetic Plains of India

  • Author:
  • Seema1,*, Amlan Kumar Ghosh1, Preeti Singh2, Rekha Sodani3, Shalini Sharma1, Satya Narayana Pradhan1, Biswabara Sahu4
  • Total Page Count: 13
  • Page Number: 34 to 46

1Soil Technology and Carbon Sequestration Laboratory Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India

2ICAR-IARI, Gauria Karma, Hazaribag, 825405, Jharkhand, India

3Department of Plant Physiology, College of Agriculture, Nagaur, Agriculture University, Jodhpur, 342304, Rajasthan, India

4Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, 751003, Odisha, India

*Corresponding author (Email: seemachahar94@gmail.com)

Online published on 8 August, 2025.

Abstract

Salts in the root zone have high spatial variability, change rapidly and adversely affect soil quality and crop productivity. In contrast to the time-intensive traditional methods for measuring electrical conductivity (EC), visible-near infrared (Vis-NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy provide faster alternatives that can assist in creating strategies to reduce negative impacts on soil and plants. Soils were collected from the Indo-Gangetic Plains and analysed for EC1:2.5 using conventional method. There was a wide variation in EC measured by the conventional method. So Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) was used to predict soil EC from spectral data, with the data divided into calibration (70%) and validation (30%) datasets. The partial least square regression (PLSR), random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) both in Vis-NIR and MIR region during calibration. The predictive performance of PLSR, RF, SVR, and MARS models for EC1:2.5 in the Vis-NIR range showed PLSR as the best model (R2 = 0.84, RMSE = 0.21, RPD = 2.44). In the MIR range, RF was considered fairly good (R2 = 0.52, RMSE = 0.20, RPD = 1.43). Vis-NIR spectroscopy with PLSR algorithm predicted EC better than MIR spectroscopy and would be the method of choice for rapid estimation and prediction of EC in the study region.

Keywords

Multivariate analysis, Climate change, Remote sensing, Vis-NIR, MIR spectra, Salinity, Spectroscopy