Journal of Income & Wealth (The)
  • Year: 2019
  • Volume: 41
  • Issue: 1

Dynamics of rural poverty in undivided Andhra Pradesh

  • Author:
  • Priyabrata Sahoo1,, S. Indrakanta2, Prashanta Panda3
  • Total Page Count: 12
  • Page Number: 107 to 118

1Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

2Visiting Professor, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

3Associate Professor, Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

*Corresponding author email id: priyabrata.s@bhu.ac.in

JEL Classification Code: R2, R23, I3

Abstract

There is an opinion that the Telangana region of the undivided AP has been neglected by the then state government and it remains backward since decades. This article examines the claim of economic development of both the states by looking into the rural poverty in Andhra Pradesh & Telangana, the newly formed states of undivided Andhra Pradesh, since post-reform. Hence the major proposition which the article raises is; which regions and which class (occupation groups and land holding groups) are more poverty ridden in the undivided Andhra Pradesh. The National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) unit level data for 50th, 61st and 68th rounds Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) has been used for the analysis. Telangana state has seen a lower level of poverty and faster reduction in poverty in the post-reform period in comparison to Andhra Pradesh. The 1st period (1993–94 to 2004–05) has seen a slow reduction in poverty while the 2nd period (2004–05 to 2011–12) witness a higher decline in poverty in both the regions. The decline in poverty is higher among the rural nonfarm sector. Andhra Pradesh constitutes around 70% of the total poor. In the 1st period, there is a labor mobility from farm to nonfarm sector, while the 2nd period witnesses mobility of labor within farm sector in Telangana and from farm to nonfarm sector in Andhra Pradesh. The 1st period has seen high growth in real MPCE among the nonfarm occupation groups while the 2nd period witnesses a growth in MPCE both in rural farm and nonfarm sector. The decomposition of poverty shows it's the growth of MPCE which results in a higher poverty reduction as inequality has seen rising trends in the post-reform period which offset the poverty reduction.

Keywords

Rural poverty, Economic groups, Land holding Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Undivided Andhra Pradesh