1Scientist, Crop Production Division, ICAR-VPKAS, Almora-263601, Uttarakhand
2Emeritus Scientist, Water Technology Centre, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi-110 012
3Ph.D. Research Scholar, Division of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi-110 012
4Ph.D. Research Scholar, Water Science and Technology, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi-110 012
*Corresponding author Email id: jitendra.kumar3@icar.gov.in
Online published on 10 August, 2020.
This study evaluated the performance of soil moisture sensors i.e. tensiometer, watermark and frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) under field conditions during growing season of brinjal crop. On comparing performance of different sensors (tensiometer, watermark and FDR) had a coefficient of determination (R2) range of 0.68-0.86, 0.68-0.83 and 0.79-0.85, respectively against gravimetric methods at different soil profile layers of 20 cm, 30 cm, 45 cm and 60 cm. Statistically, the performance of tensiometer was found best on comparing with watermark and FDR at 20 cm and 30 cm depth, respectively. The tensiometer had the minimum RRMSE and Md values of 10.09% and - 0.82, respectively with high R2 value of 0.86 at 30 cm soil depth. Watermark and FDR performance at 60 cm depth was found appreciable with mean difference of 0.19 and 1.35, RRMSE value 12.87, 12.52 and R2 value 0.83, 0.86,respectively. The average performance of frequency domain reflectometry and tensiometer had greater coefficient of determination (R2) than watermark sensor at different depths by comparing their readings with that obtained by gravimetric method in brinjal crop. The watermark showed a consistent and increasingly drier estimate of water content compared to tensiometer.
Drip irrigation, Frequency domain reflectometry, Irrigation scheduling, Tensiometer, Watermark