1College of Agriculture, Gwalior-474 002, Madhya Pradesh, India
2College of Agriculture, Jabalpur-482 004, Madhya Pradesh, India
Bhagwant Rao Mandaloi College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Khandwa-450 001, Madhya Pradesh, India
*Corresponding author's e-mail: souravgupta654@gmail.com
Online published on 16 November, 2019.
The field experiment carried out during kharif seasons of 2015 and 2016 at Research Farm, College of Agriculture, RVSKVV, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh indicated that HG 2–20 (V2) was significantly superior under weed control efficiency, crop growth and yield attributes, seed yield and economics over HG 563 (V1). 30 cm x 10 cm (S1) crop geometry observed significantly effective over 45 cm x 6.5 cm (S2). Weed free situation (W5) was significantly superior in similar parameters; while lower values were observed under weedy plot (W6). Among herbicidal treatments; Imazethapyr 35% WG + Imazamox 35% WG (Pre-mix) @ 40 g a.i./ha (W4) followed by Imazethapyr 10% EC @ 75 g a.i./ha (W3) were achieved statistically at par and significantly effective results over rest of the treatments. In case of interaction; the significantly superior values were registered under interaction of HG 2–20 (V2) with 30 cm x 10 cm (S1) to weed free situation (W5) over rest of the interactions. Among interaction of herbicidal treatments with varieties and crop geometries; Imazethapyr 35% WG + Imazamox 35% WG (Pre-mix) @ 40 g a.i./ha (W4) combined with HG 2–20 (V2) and 30 cm x 10 cm (S1) earned significantly effective over other interactions.
Clusterbean, Crop geometry, Economics, Growth and Yield attributes, Weed control efficiency, Weed management practices