Legume Research
Web of Science
  • Year: 2024
  • Volume: 47
  • Issue: 3

Morphological characterization and diversity assessment of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) wilczek] genotypes using DUS descriptors as per PPV and FRA, 2001

  • Author:
  • Navreet Kaur Rai1, Ravika1,*, Rajesh Yadav1, Amit Karuna1, Deepak Kaushik1
  • Total Page Count: 9
  • Page Number: 361 to 369

1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India

*Corresponding Author: Ravika, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India, Email: ravika.sheoran@hau.ac.in

Online published on 1 October, 2024.

Abstract

Variety characterization is the foremost important step that should be done by breeders to classify a variety into distinct groups. A significant technique for locating and assessing several genotypes for the registration, protection and production of seeds of superior quality is the Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability (DUS) characterization. Consequently, the current investigation aimed to use DUS descriptors to describe and assess the variance present in mungbean genotypes.

One hundred forty-two mungbean genotypes were examined using 21 agro-morphological qualitative DUS descriptors in a randomized block design with two replications across two seasons, kharif 2021 and kharif 2022.

In the twenty-one DUS traits that were examined, four characters’ plant growth habit, leaf shape, leaf size and seed size exhibited trimorphic variance. Three characters (plant habit, stem pubescence and pod pubescence) were found to be identical among all genotypes while fourteen characters displayed dimorphic variance. All of the mungbean genotypes displayed a significant degree of variance for all DUS characteristics. Based on the UPGMA method of clustering, the dendrogram classified all the one hundred forty-two genotypes into three major clusters. The presence of variation among the genotypes under study was demonstrated by the further classification of these primary clusters into five sub-clusters. The majority of the genotypes were found in cluster II (121 genotypes), which was followed by cluster I (18 genotypes) and cluster III (3 genotypes).

Keywords

Dendrogram, Distinctness, Stability, Uniformity, UPGMA, Variance