Madras Agricultural Journal
Open Access
  • Year: 2025
  • Volume: 112
  • Issue: 3

Applicability of Hargreaves-Samani and Valiantzas’ Models for Solar Radiation Estimation in Coimbatore using Temperature and Humidity Inputs

  • Author:
  • A. Anto Rashwin1,*, S.K. Rajkishore2, J. Ramachandran3
  • Total Page Count: 11
  • Published Online: May 8, 2026
  • Page Number: 71 to 81

1Department of Environmental Sciences, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore641 003, Tamil Nadu, India

2Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, Agricultural Engineering College & Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore641 003, Tamil Nadu, India

3Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore641 003, Tamil Nadu, India

*Corresponding author mail: antorashwin@gmail.com

Online Published on 08 May, 2026.

Abstract

Precise estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET) is crucial for effective irrigation planning and water resource management, particularly in semi-arid regions such as Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. The FAO56 Penman–Monteith (FAO56-PM) method is widely regarded as the standard approach for ET estimation. Still, its application is limited by the requirement of multiple meteorological inputs, including solar radiation (Rs) and wind speed, which are often unavailable or unreliable in many regions. This study evaluates two simplified models for estimating Rs, the Hargreaves–Samani (HS) model and the modified version by Valiantzas (2017), which incorporates relative humidity (RH) along with temperature, and examines their impact on FAO56-PM ET estimation using 21 years (2004–2024) of NASA POWER meteorological data for Coimbatore. Results showed a strong correlation between measured Rs and estimated Rs values, with the HS model achieving an R2 of 0.7866 and the Valiantzas’ model an R2 of 0.7034. When used to compute ET, both models showed excellent agreement with FAO56-PM ET derived from measured Rs, with R2 values of 0.9477 (HS) and 0.9281 (Valiantzas), and low standard error estimates (SEE < 0.22 mm day-1). Seasonal analysis revealed that the models accurately preserved the expected ET patterns, with peak values in summer and minima in winter, aligning with trends in solar radiation. The findings confirm that both HS and Valiantzas’ models provide reliable alternatives for Rs estimation and ET computation in data-scarce environments. The HS model, due to its simplicity and robustness under clearsky conditions, is particularly well-suited for semi-arid climates. In contrast, the Valiantzas’ model offers added flexibility in regions with variable humidity. These results highlight the potential of simplified radiation models to enhance irrigation planning when comprehensive weather data are unavailable.

Keywords

Reference evapotranspiration, FAO56-PM, Hargreaves–Samani, Valiantzas’model, Solar radiation estimation, Semi-arid, Coimbatore, NASA POWER