Pesticide Research Journal
SCOPUSWeb of Science
  • Year: 2010
  • Volume: 22
  • Issue: 1

Validation and Promotion of Farmer-Participatory IPM Technology in Chickpea - A Case Study

  • Author:
  • TP Trivedi1, KN Ojha2, Naved Sabir3,, Jitendra Singh4, HR Sardana3, HR Chaudhary5
  • Total Page Count: 5
  • Page Number: 68 to 72

1Directorate of Information and Publication of Agriculture, ICAR, New Delhi

2Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Borkhera, Kota

3National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012.

4Central Institute of Post Harvest Engineering and Technology, Abohar, Punjab

5Agriculture Research Station. Ummedganj, Kota, India

*Corresponding author n_sabir@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Studies on development and promotion of IPM technology in high yielding and tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) variety, RSG-44 were carried out for three consecutive crop seasons (2001–2004). Large area of chickpea growing fields comprising about 50 ha was adopted in 4 villages of Kota district. Rajasthan. which is located in 6th agro-ecological region of India. In adopted IPM fields, an average of 72.2 pods plant with 8.45% pod borer damage were found as compared to only 62.58 pods with 16.27% pod borer damage under conventional (non-IPM) conditions, indicating around 50% more pod damage in non-IPM plots. Root length of the plants was found significantly more as compared to non-IPM fields from 2001–2004. Similarly, shoot length was also found significantly greater in IPM fields than the non-IPM fields. Number of root nodules was recorded 12.9 plant−1 in IPM fields, whereas, 7.2 plant−1 in non-IPM fields. Due to reduction of sprays of chemical insecticides in IPM practice, an abundant number of predatory birds were observed in IPM fields. An average yield of 16.13 q ha−1 was achieved in IPM and only 9.93 q ha−1 in non-IPM fields. Similarly, the cost-benefit ratio of 1:4.35 was recorded in IPM while it was 1:2.44 in non-IPM one.

Keywords

IPM, IPM module, pest incidence, IPM adoption, pod borer